A pharmacist-scientist and regulated intelligence architect who connects molecules, evidence, operations, semantics and AI into systems that work.Follow one medicine from scientific discovery to the patient and see how those systems become trustworthy.
Follow the medicine ↓Select an intersection to compare the assignment with the career evidence.
Production RAG, multi-agent workflows, structured evaluation and human sign-off.
Design and apply agentic AI to pharmaceutical safety work without removing scientific accountability.
NewsRx production evaluation and Amgen’s controlled regulatory GenAI join retrieval, judges, feedback and qualified review.
Choose a path, then inspect any stage to see its evidence, authority, AI boundary and career proof.
lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan
Follow one adverse event as clinical language becomes structured evidence, a safety signal and an accountable lifecycle decision.
The same governed evidence supports labeling, safety reporting, commitments, postapproval changes and recall decisions.
A knowledge graph connects facts. A hyperknowledge graph connects each claim to evidence, context, time, provenance, conflict and accountable authority.
Entities are joined through typed, pairwise relationships.
Facts begin as simple connections. A medicine connects to its isotope, target, disease and pivotal study through pairwise relationships.
Governed data · semantics · ontology · model validation · provenance · qualified human authority · lifecycle monitoring
Select an era to see what changed, what worked and what carried forward.
DARPA scientific modeling · Tc-99m labeled-white-cell IND · Cardinal/Syncor nuclear pharmacy · PET hub-and-spoke delivery
Radiation physics, pharmacy practice, FDA, NRC, cGMP, hazardous-material transport and the Five Rights.
Converted decaying material and strict clinical obligations into a reliable national operating system.
Physical reality, controlled evidence and accountable handoffs became the foundation for every later system.
Whatever the technology, someone must understand the evidence well enough to act and remain answerable for what follows.
